Jun 11, 2022
In General Discussions
Why should we talk about strategy first, because in many cases, executives will only find the implementation problem of a certain link or point, and then indiscriminately amplify, resulting in the strange phenomenon of peeking at Whatsapp Database the leopard, and there is no systematic way to measure the overall benefit. question. If the activity is low, the resources will be smashed to promote the activity, and if the new ones are not enough, all the resources will Whatsapp Database be smashed and fissioned, with zero planning and zero rhythm; After the launch, it is found that the core indicators have increased, but the non-core indicators have declined. Do you need to continue to launch? There is also a strange phenomenon of doing it purely for the sake of doing it, without knowing Whatsapp Database what the core of the stage is or why. When the scale of the community is still small, it is still possible to respond and adjust in a timely manner by Whatsapp Database increasing human input, and the drawbacks will not be particularly obvious at this time. However, when the order of magnitude reaches a certain level, the response is not timely, and tactical deformities Whatsapp Database appear over time, and the overall strategy becomes useless: Tactics often deviate from the main direction, core indicators are blurred, jumps between non-key indicators repeatedly, or indecision; Or there is no timely adjustment of the staged Whatsapp Database transition, and the 3.0 stage is still stuck in the 1.0 style of play. In the end, it will lead to the inefficiency of a certain module and the lag of the development of the whole plate.